Comparative Cartography
/A Succinct Example of the Core Methodology of Traditional Map History
Read MoreA blog on the study of mapping processes: production, circulation, and consumption
A Succinct Example of the Core Methodology of Traditional Map History
Read MoreMap Librarians Will Be Horrified!
Read MoreDisambiguating a commonly used term that is potentially culturally biased
Read MoreOr, the Problems of Relying on an Edited Translation without Referring to the Original
Read MoreAn unequivocal statement of the idea that maps necessarily constitute “a god’s eye view” of the world
Read MoreA fairly simple enquiry — how relevant is it to talk about the development and evolution of maps and mapping? — soon gets wrapped up in questions about the nature of “maps” and “mapping” and therefore how we define maps, cartography, map history, and map studies generally.
Read MoreMapping as Process is a space for me to explore a new approach to understanding mapping and its history. The exploration will eventually contribute to a book of the same name.
Cartography in the European Enlightenment, Volume Four of The History of Cartography, edited by myself and Mary Pedley. Available from the University of Chicago Press, in print and ebook ($500).
Available from the University of Chicago Press in paperback ($30), e-book ($10–30), or cloth ($90).
Some paperback ($38) copies are still available, as well as the ebook, from the University of Chicago Press.
For notifications of new content:
a) add Mapping as Process to your favorite RSS application (I use reeder);
b) follow me on Mastodon: @mhedney@historians.social; or
c) subscribe to h-maps for occasional updates.
All images are used in accordance with academic “fair use” copyright provisions.
All text (c) Matthew H. Edney and is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Powered by Squarespace.